What landmark case established the principle of judicial review?

What landmark case established the principle of judicial review?

• A. Brown v. Board of Education
• B. Roe v. Wade
• C. Marbury v. Madison
• D. Plessy v. Ferguson

Answer: (C)

Marbury v. Madison is the landmark case that established the principle of judicial review, which is the power of the courts to examine the actions of the legislative and executive branches and determine whether they are in compliance with the Constitution. This decision, rendered in 1803, laid the foundation for the judiciary's role as a check on legislative and executive power, ensuring that no law or government action can supersede the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall articulated that it is the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, thus affirming the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution. This case set a crucial precedent for the power of the courts, empowering future justices to strike down laws that they find unconstitutional, thereby reinforcing the idea of the rule of law and the separation of powers. Understanding this case is vital, as it underscores the importance of the judicial branch in maintaining a balanced government system and protecting individual rights as outlined in the Constitution.

Marbury v. Madison is the landmark case that established the principle of judicial review, which is the power of the courts to examine the actions of the legislative and executive branches and determine whether they are in compliance with the Constitution. This decision, rendered in 1803, laid the foundation for the judiciary's role as a check on legislative and executive power, ensuring that no law or government action can supersede the Constitution.

In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall articulated that it is the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, thus affirming the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution. This case set a crucial precedent for the power of the courts, empowering future justices to strike down laws that they find unconstitutional, thereby reinforcing the idea of the rule of law and the separation of powers.

Understanding this case is vital, as it underscores the importance of the judicial branch in maintaining a balanced government system and protecting individual rights as outlined in the Constitution.